Wednesday, July 13, 2011

WHY I DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN BERSIH 2.0


Many people asked me if I was going to the streets on July 9. I made a conscious decision not to participate in the Bersih 2.0 peaceful march for personal reasons --- probably due to my upbringing or religious convictions.

Nonetheless, I was equally concerned about the development in my country. I counted myself to be “in spirit” with the Bersih 2.0 people who made a stand for Clean and Fair Election. Despite the attempts to demonise Bersih’s noble objectives, nothing stood out more than the eight demands spelt out by its president, Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan.

The people of Malaysia demand for a clean and fair election. This, unfortunately, the Election Commission and Najib’s administration have stubbornly stood their ground, assuming that for every one person who participated in the rally, another 100 or 1000 people were against it.

As far as I know, Ambiga was picked to receive the International Women of Courage in 2009. Here was a woman of great admiration, who stood for what she believes in. Malaysia has never before seen a woman of her stature who would defend her rights as a voter in this country. She has risen above the “pariah” community, which the Malay literature Intelok had portrayed to the detriments of race relations in this country.

Compare this to Datuk Ibrahim Ali, president of the right-wing and pro-Umno NGO, Perkasa. He was filled with hot air, but the balloon finally burst at the eleventh hour. Instead of showing up in Kuala Lumpur, he was holed up in his home, giving the excuse that he was one of the 91 persons banned from entering into the city. As if his wife had never advised him against being a fool himself, for once, he had to heed the advice of his better half.

Many of us who were watching the “matches” knew that both Perkasa and Umno Youth made their noises mainly to intimidate and to scare the people from the Bersih 2.0 rally. The Najib administration failed to put a stop to some of these elements, including Umno’s Utusan Malaysia, which were trying to play up racial and religious tension, hoping to use this to demonise the Bersih 2.0 rally.

I am glad that many Malaysians stood up for their rights to a clean and fair election. I estimate it to be anything between 20,000 to 50,000 people. The official figure of between 5,000 and 6,000 quoted by the authorities rings hollow, judging from the sea of people in the photographs and videos.

Contrary to news reports about Molotov and parangs linked to Bersih 2.0, I believe none of the people who were arrested had any form of armed resistance. The evidence from the amount of video and photographs published on the Internet showed what appeared to be a peaceful demonstration by civilians.

The appearance of 65-year-old Auntie Anne Ooi is a testimony of what all Malaysians, young and old, can do when faced with a government that continues to use brutality against civilians. Some of the policemen whom I know personally said that they have no choice but to act against the non-violent civilians. With the exception of some in the police force, as far as I can see it, the blame has to fall on the political masters of the day.

I have time and again reminded Najib’s administration through numerous channels of communication that “a government that continues to fight the civilians will not last very long.” The tipping point will come and any ruling party that wants to win the hearts of the people again sometime in the future will ensure a smooth transition of power instead of creating more political havoc – something that we are witnessing these days.

The domino effect seen, since the People’s Power in the Philippines, Indonesia, and recently in Thailand, will not be easily overcome with force. No amount of harassment by the Special Branch or the police will stop the people from becoming more resolved to see a change of government. There are many lessons to be learnt from the sage of old, the late Mahatma Gandhi. Thousands of Indians were arrested, but with each arrest, the multiplying effect is simply too big for the colonial government to cope at the end of the day.

Najib should realise that it is not as if he were to shed blood that he and his men could remain in power. The people can choose to kick you out of Putrajaya tomorrow. They can put another person in power. This is true democracy, Malaysian-style or otherwise. This is something that our political leaders, including the prime minister himself, have failed to understand despite Malaysia being a democratic nation. Dirty politics have been played over and over again, since March 2008 – and I cannot help it but to say, Enough is enough!

One good example is the recent shameless expose of a man having sex with a lady is a good example. In a country where religious sentiments are high, the expose has rocked the nation. Any right thinking person in this country would not buy the Datuk T’s lies which were aimed at forcing Anwar Ibrahim and his wife to step down. No one would be as foolish as these three to think that they could not have called the whole contingent of police, FRU and Jakim personnel to capture Anwar Ibrahim red-handed in the hotel room – so what’s the point of using a black-and-white video clip in the first place!

If these three stooges think they can fool the people of Malaysia using so-called foreign “experts” from Dartmouth College, I even took the trouble to write an email to both Professor Farid Hany ('farid@cs.dartmouth.edu') and the president (via email to 'President's.Office@Dartmouth.edu') of that tiny college in the US. It is only fair that Professor Hany should furnish the report or dispute the news report, since his credibility and that of his college was at stake, if he had not made the claims that the person in the video was 99.99% Anwar Ibrahim. Repeated emails were not responded to!

I believe many Malaysians agree with me. What we have seen so far is bad enough to make us say, “Enough lah!” The ball is in the court of the people in power, on how they want to win back the people, but CHANGE appears to be the order of the day after 54 years the country has come under the rule of Barisan Nasional.

Barisan Nasional, at its peak during the hey days of Allahyarham Tunku Abdul Rahman, was a beautiful coalition of political parties, comprising people from all walks of life. Religion and race did not differentiate one Malaysian from another. I remember my late father telling us that in Pahang, he was enjoying his breakfast with other Malay colleagues when there were riots of May 13 in Kuala Lumpur.

Umno had started breaking up in 1987 during the former prime minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed who, despite nearly losing to his Team B rival, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, continued to build his foundation with Team A people. Most of the people in Team B had left Umno to join Semangat 46 and subsequently PAS. The country’s Malay party was ruled with an iron fist by one man, whose descent is unquestionably from Kerala, India, who despite promising not to meddle with the politics of the day, had continued to whack former prime minister, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. This was my turning point when I saw how wicked a man could be even into his old age. At that juncture, I said to myself, “Enough is enough!”

Bersih 2.0 was the climax of my disappointment with the present administration. They can use all the force, laws or detention orders against the civilians, but when the silent majority pushes forward, they better opt for a smooth transition of power – that is, if they want to win the people’s hearts once again!

Now, that July 9 is over, as I look back, perhaps, the reason why I chose not to participate in the Bersih 2.0 rally is because I wanted to prove to the authorities that thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, or even into the millions of Malaysians, are with Bersih 2.0. They may not be wearing the Bersih t-shirts, but their hearts have turned yellow. They are wearing the Yellow t-shirt in their hearts – something that no government will be able to fight against.

Cheers

Stephen Ng

My favourite colour is Yellow

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Down with Kerajaan Songsang!

A BN vote bank is aided by Pakatan
Terence Netto
Jan 22, 11
10:59am
The Temiar of Sungai Siput have long been a reliable vote bank for the BN, something like 9,000 of them domiciled on the banks of tributaries of the Sungai Perak that crisscross the constituency, giving the ruling coalition 99 percent of the vote in the general election of 1999, 96 percent in 2004, and 90 percent in 2008.

In all that time, the recipient of this largesse, MIC's S Samy Vellu, confined reciprocation to the giving out of presents to headmen while the Orang Asli Department (JHEOA) periodically supplemented the trickle with handouts.

Apparently, from whom a lot is given little is required.

A rather bleak situation, one might say, to a prospective MP trying to break the cycle of servitude in which the Temiar are immured.

penang psm dinner 181210 jeyakumar devarajBut Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj of the Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM), since 1999 a rival claimant to S Samy Vellu for the allegiance of Sungai Siput's voters, decided that even if naught is to be had for service to the Temiar by an opposition politician, service must still be rendered.

Thus when the 400 Temiar of some 50 households in Kampong Perje in Pos Legap needed money in 2009 to buy new cables to secure a rickety bridge over the Sungai Pelus, used by them to ferry the latex they tapped from rubber trees off the banks, they approached their newly elected MP.

“We decided that because their conditions were wretched, their needs overrode other considerations such as their solid support for the BN,” said Jeyakumar, who was elected in March 2008 on a wave for the opposition that year.

NONE“Also, representatives of Kampong Perje continued to attend meetings we held to discuss Orang Asli needs even after the fall of the Pakatan state government in February 2009,” he said. “Reps from other Orang Asli villages kept away out of fear,” he added.

Popularly known as 'Dr Kumar', the PSM activist had made forays into Orang Asli villages deep in the interior of Sungai Siput even when he was not their elected MP prior to 2008, to see what could done for them.

NONE“They are a terribly marginalised group and they needed all the help they can get,” he rationalized.

So when Pos Legap's Temiar wanted new cables for a dilapidated bridge, Dr Kumar and his crew of PSM stalwarts in Sungai Siput decided that it would be better to build a new bridge a kilometer away from the site of the old one.

“The old one was too rickety,” he said. “There was little point in shoring it up with new cables.”

But where to get the money for the new bridge, given that opposition MPs are deprived by the federal government of constituency allocations rendered to the tune of RM2 million a year to BN legislators?

PAS leader steps in to help

Dr Kumar, who was elected on a PKR ticket because PSM was not yet a registered political party in March 2008, asked help from his Pakatan Rakyat cohort in Sungai Siput.

NONEThe PAS leader in the constituency, Ahmad Mazlan Othman, a retired army engineer who had been a candidate for the Lintang state seat in the 1999 and 2004 elections, was instrumental in getting his party to contribute RM5,000 to the overall cost of the new bridge which was estimated at RM70,000.

The rest of the budget was raised from the MP allowances for Dr Kumar (RM35,000), from sundry friends of his (RM20,000) and from two Catholic groups (RM10,000).

In short, the money for the new bridge came out of a Pakatan-like collaborative effort by assorted groups. From whom much is deprived, not a little can be got.

Construction of the bridge, which was supervised at every stage by Ahmad Mazlan, began in August 2009.

NONEA squad of PAS volunteers helped out at every stage of the construction. PSM activists M Sukumaran, M Augustine, S Nagentiran and Alexis Paulraj did turns helping out with the technical and other inputs.

Jointly and severally, this motley crew pooled their slender resources which Ahmad, with his professional expertise, ably marshaled to bring the bridge to near completion.

“There is only a little more work left to be finished,” said Dr Kumar, “which Ahmad says would be completed this weekend or over the next.”

NONEThere will be no opening ceremony for this bridge that a Pakatan-like 'gotong royong' has almost brought to pass for the Temiar of Pos Legap and no plaques to honour the selfless band involved in its conception and construction.

Whether the bridge would shift the Temiar's voting allegiance is a question of some irrelevance to Dr Kumar.

“The wretched must inherit the earth,” said Dr Kumar in typically socialistic, Franz Fanon-like, style.
View Comments (26)


Getting something done with very little
Jan 23, 11 9:02am
vox populi small thumbnail'This project is born out of needs and not as a bribe to help the Orang Asli to make their already harsh lives a little bit easier.'

A BN vote bank is aided by Pakatan

P Dev Anand Pillai: Whilst most BN MPs will laugh the matter off when they are approached for funds to build amenities like this, MP Dr D Jeyakumar has shown the way.

If PM Najib Razak really meant 'People First, Performance Now', the job could have been done with a phone call to JKR (Public Works Department), but as usual politics comes first.

Perhaps what Umno has forgotten is that as they pursue wealth via capitalism, the people have been forgotten. Though the Orang Asli may be swayed by money and gifts, this selfless act by Dr Kumar will see more of them voting for him from the interiors of Sungai Siput.

Black Mamba: Perak needs to revert to Pakatan Rakyat, and Putrajaya too, before funds for all constituencies will flow again to where it is needed most, the rakyat.

This is a great effort by the Catholic groups and PAS to work for the sole purpose of meeting a basic human need irrespective of culture, faith and race. PAS may be an Islamic party but they are to be lauded for their justice, fairness and incorruptible leaders.

BN wants a 100-storey tower that only serves the pride and ego of the leaders but of no use to the citizens at large who are in need of basic amenities such as electricity, clean drinkable water and functional sanitary.

Anonymous_417c: This is a heartwarming story that will light up anyone's day. I suggest PM Najib personally call up the MP (Jeyakumar) and thank him for the good work.

Disgusted: This is how Pakatan government and their representatives have to work - starved of funds legitimately due to them because they are in the opposition, while the actual funds due to their constituency are given to BN reps who were not elected by the rakyat and with no accountability as to how it was spent.

Isn't it time to replace the government in Putrajaya so that all citizens in Malaysia will receive a fair deal from the government? The ball is in the rakyat's court.

Tsc: This is truly 1Malaysia. With the help from different groups, be it in monetrary or effort, such projects can bring tremendous improvement to the lives of the Orang Asli. This is indeed a no-frills project without a commemorative plaque and an opening ceremony with some big shot's presence, which will just waste more public money.

Anonymous: It doesn't matter where the resources are from. These donors are sincere in doing good for the benefit of the people who need it most, leaving politics aside. They have compassion for the weak and needy, and are genuine in their contribution. This should be the driving force, and not personal gain.

Swipenter: This reinforces the fact that PR does no practice discrimination based on race, religion or creed and definitely not political affiliation unlike Umno/BN. There is no "you help me, I help you" thingy.

The project is born out of needs and not as a bribe to help the villagers to make their already harsh lives a little bit easier. Our salutations and respects to all those who contribute to the completion and success of building of the bridge.

Ong Guan Sin: I am lost for words. When the politics in the country is so full of patronage culture and 'cost-benefit analysis', YB Dr Jeyakumar is a rare gem that Malaysia must treasure.

Venu: People of different races working for a common good in the service of humanity, it is beautiful to see.


Monday, December 27, 2010

Sidek should maintain high degree of professionalism

Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan should maintain a high degree of professionalism as the Chief Secretary to the Federal Government.

We urge Tan Sri Sidek not to interfere with the Selangor State administration.


Thursday, December 9, 2010

Bravo to YB William Leong and YB Ean Yong

Bravo to YB William Leong and YB Ean Yong Hian Wah!

Now, Taman Daya residents are closer to getting their individual land title issued. They have waited for over 25 years, since the developer went bankrupt. Their title issue is the result of poor supervision by the Ministry of Housing & Local Government. When its minister, especially Ting Chew Pei, was informed of the problem, he never took up the issue seriously; neither was the Housing & Local Government Act tightened to take such developers to task for defaulting in their obligations to housebuyers.

When a friend of mine told me regarding this issue and he planned to get the help of Chan Kong Choy, former Member of Parliament of Selayang, I told him, "Forget about it! I have approached these two clowns: Chan, and his assistant, Wong Kung-Fu. Not even that old clown, Tang See Hang! They do nothing but play tai-chi!" One meeting after another was called with the developer, and finally, my friend gave up. That was before the 2008 General Election. Now, Chan is no where to be found! Probably, the PKFZ scandal has scared him off.

It was last year that I approached my friend's twin brother to bring him to see William Leong and help them organise a press conference. They were both my schoolmates. Within one year, the solution is closer at hand, thanks to William Leong and Ean Yong! Bravo to you guys for working hard to help the people unlike those who try to make things worse for people who voted for you! They have lost our confidence, but you have won ours for many years to come.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Friday December 10, 2010

End in sight for land title problem

By PRIYA MENON
priya@thestar.com.my


AN END is in sight for the 20-year land title issue that has been plaguing residents of Taman Daya, Kepong, as a briefing will be held on Sunday to explain the next step in procuring the individual titles.

For 20 years, 288 residents of the second phase of the project have been fighting for their titles.

The area is divided into three master land titles where the first phase titles were sub-divided in 1991 and handed out to the owners in 2001.

After pressing the land office, a meeting was held on Dec 29 last year with Gombak Land Office assistant district officer who announced that residents who have yet to receive their individual titles would only have to pay RM1,000 as land premium.

The Taman Daya Residents Association was preparing to announce the good news to the residents when they were told by the new assistant district officer on Feb 12 that the rate would be between RM6,000 and RM7,000 per unit.

They then sought the assistance of Selangor state executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah and Selayang MP William Leong to pursue the matter. Both Ean and Leong sent in a letter to the officer who later replied that the extra payment was for special added premium.

Leong’s secretary Chan Foo Chuen said the special added premium was the outstanding premium that the previous developers failed to pay.

“The amount falls back on the buyers,” he said.

RA chairman Tan Chong Leng later met state executive councillor for Housing, Building Development and Squatters Iskandar Abdul Samad to solve the issue.

“Iskandar was also surprised by the amount and the matter was raised at the state executive council meeting.

“There they decided to waive the special added premium, bringing the rate back to RM1,000,” he added.

Finally, they received a letter from the Gombak Land Office on Oct 25, confirming an amount of RM1,470 per unit to proceed with the sub-division.

Property owners have been asked to attend the briefing on Sunday at 10am at the association’s office that will be held with Leong, the assistant district officer and a surveyor.

The court-appointed liquidator, however, has yet to confirm attendance.

“We hope the liquidator will be able to attend because we need them to confirm the actual property owners especially for units that have changed hands a number of times,” added Tan.

Owners have been advised to bring along two photostated copies of their MyKad, latest sale and purchase agreement, deed assignment as well as the rest and reassignment.

For details, contact Leong’s special officer Loo Voon May at 012-2983 721 or Tan at 019-662 3913.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Eat the cake

Found this in the Internet as I googled for "Eat the cake". Could this be the reason for the "eat the cake" sessions? If yes, who is the Malaysian version of Marie-Antoinette?



Let them eat cake

Origin

The origins of many English phrases are unknown. Nevertheless, many people would say that they know the source of this one. It is widely attributed to Marie-Antoinette (1755-93), the Queen consort of Louis XVI. She is supposed to have said this when she was told that the French populace had no bread to eat.

The original French is 'Qu'ils mangent de la brioche', i.e. 'Let them eat brioche' (brioche is a form of cake made of flour, butter and eggs). The usual interpretation of the phrase is that Marie-Antoinette understood little about the plight of the poor and cared even less. There are two problems with that interpretation:

1. There's no evidence of any kind that Marie-Antoinette ever uttered those words or anything like them, and
2. The phrase, in as much as it can be shown to be associated with the French nobility, can be interpreted in other ways, for example, it could have either ironic or even a genuine attempt to offer cake to the poor as an alternative to the bread that they couldn't afford.

As to the origin of the expression, two notable contemporaries of Marie-Antoinette - Louis XVIII and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, attribute the phrase to a source other than her. In Louis XVIII's memoir Relation d'un voyage a Bruxelles et d Coblentz, 1791, he states that the phrase 'Que ne mangent-ils de la croûte de pâté?' (Why don't they eat pastry?) was used by Marie-Thérèse (1638-83), the wife of Louis XIV. That account was published almost a century after Marie-Thérèse's death though, so it must be treated with some caution.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau's 12-volume autobiographical work Confessions, was written in 1770. In Book 6, which was written around 1767, he recalls:

At length I recollected the thoughtless saying of a great princess, who, on being informed that the country people had no bread, replied, "Then let them eat pastry!"

let them eat cakeMarie-Antoinette arrived at Versailles from her native Austria in 1770, two or three years after Rousseau had written the above passage. Whoever the 'great princess' was - possibly Marie-Thérèse, it wasn't Marie-Antoinette.

Her reputation as an indulgent socialite is difficult to shake, but it appears to be unwarranted and is a reminder that history is written by the victors. She was known to have said "It is quite certain that in seeing the people who treat us so well despite their own misfortune, we are more obliged than ever to work hard for their happiness". Nevertheless, the French revolutionaries thought even less of her than we do today and she was guillotined to death in 1793 for the crime of treason.

Bravo, Mat Zain!

Saiful Amri
KUALA LUMPUR, 23 Nov: Walaupun sudah 12 tahun berlalu, tragedi 'Mata Lebam' Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim masih menghantui pasukan polis dan hari ini Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail sediri dikaitkan dengan tragedi ini.

Bekas Pegawai Penyiasat polis terhadap kes ini, Mat Zain Ibrahim semalam (22 November) menghantar satu surat terbuka kepada Ketua Polis Negara meminta beliau membersihkan pasukan polis dan mendakwa pihak yang patut dipersalahkan dalam isu ini adalah Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Gani Patail.

Menurut surat panjang Mat Zain kepada Tan Sri Ismail Omar itu, sekurang-kurangnya sudah dua kali Gani menipu Jamaah Menteri.

"Apa yang pasti ialah, pertuduhan menipu Jemaah Menteri terhadap Tun LLS (Ling Leong Sik) itu tidak adil kepada beliau, jika Peguam Negara pula tidak dituduh, kerana beliau juga pernah menipu Jemaah Menteri, sekurang-kurangnya dua kali," tulis Mat Zain dalam surat itu.

Menurut Mat Zain, beliau pernah diminta menemui Datuk Seri Najib Razak pada 23 Oktober 2008 ketika beliau menjadi timbalan perdana menteri. Dalam pertemuan itu, beliau berkata, Najib telah memarahi beliau apabila memberitahu satu penal telah dibentuk bagi mengkaji siasatan SPRM terhadap Ketua Polis Negara Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan Peguam Negara, Gani Patail.

"Dalam perbualan sama, saya memberitahu YAB PM mengenai maklumat yang saya perolehi; dimana pihak Kerajaan telah melantik satu Panel bagi mengkaji siasatan yang dijalankan oleh SPRM. Saya juga telah menyebutkan nama dua orang yang telah dilantik sahaja yang saya ketahui pada masa itu.

"Secara sepontan YAB PM bangun daripada tempat duduknya dan menyatakan dengan serious bahawa beliau tidak tahu menahu mengenai perlantikan Panel yang saya nyatakan kepadanya. Beliau selanjutnya menyatakan bahawa sekiranya benar sesuatu Panel telah dilantik, beliau pasti telah ditaklimatkan mengenainya.

"Malahan YAB PM telah menasihatkan saya supaya tidak percaya dengan khabar angin sedemikian kerana perkara itu adalah tidak benar. Setelah berbual satu dua perkara lain saya telah meninggalkan Pejabat YAB PM," tulis Mat Zain menceritakan bagaimana PM telah memarahi beliau.

Namun, katanya, terbukti selepas itu, Penal itu memang diwujudkan oleh Jabatan Peguam Negara sebagaimana jawapan rasmi kerajaan di Parlimen.

Pada 11.3.2009, Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz telah membuat pengumuman di-Parlimen mengenai keputusan siasatan SPRM tersebut, tulis Mat Zain.

Nazri mengumumkan bahawa siasatan SPRM telah diteliti oleh tiga orang Ahli Panel bebas yang dilantik sebagai Timbalan Pendakwa Raya(DPP) mengikut Kanun Prosidur Jenayah(CPC) oleh Peguam Cara Negara(SG) padahal sebelumnya, PM Najib telah menafikan penubuhan penal itu.

Beliau juga memberikan nama-nama tiga orang Ahli Panel bebas tersebut iaitu; Datuk Abdul Kadir Sulaiman, Datuk Wira Mohd.Noor Ahmad dan Datuk Mohd.Noor Abdullah,masing-masing mantan Hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan dan seorang mantan Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan.

Selanjutnya beliau mengumumkan bahawa Ahli Panel sebulat suara (3-0) mendapati Tan Sri Musa Hasan tidak terlibat dalam sebarang salah laku jenayah manakala keputusan majoriti (2-1) terhadap Tan Sri Gani Patail (TSGP) yang bermakna seorang dari Ahli Panel tersebut mendapati terdapat keterangan mengaitkan TSGP dalam suatu salah-laku.

Namun begitu kedua-dua TSGP dan TSMH dibersihkan daripada sebarang salah laku jenayah, tulis Mat Zain.

Menurut Mat Zain, cara Peguam Negara mengendalikan isu P I Balasubramaniam dan dakwaan terhadap Ling Leong Sik "mengesahkan tanpa ragu lagi, bahawa beliau tidak menghiraukan langsung hak kesamarataan individu dari sudut undang-undang, yang dijamin oleh Perlembagaan."

Sehubungan itu beliau mencadangkan agar Peguam Negara dihadapkan kehadapan Tribunal untuk disiasat.

"Sekiranya Ketua Hakim Negara boleh dibawa kehadapan Tribunal,jika bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri,Menteri Besar,Menteri-Menteri kanan termasuk Tun LLS,Ahli-Ahli Parlimen,Ketua Polis Negara,Panglima dalam Tentera Darat, Ketua Setiausaha Kementrian,Ketua Pengarah-Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Kerajaan dan lain-lain, mampu dihadapkan kemuka pengadilan oleh Kerajaan,malah ada diantara mereka yang telah menjalani hukuman,dibuang kes dan ada yang masih menunggu perbicaraan selain daripada telah diaibkan. Apa istimewanya Peguam Negara?" tulis beliau.

Mat Zain juga mengaitkan kes Mata Lebam dengan Peguam Negara.

Menurutnya, persetujuan telah dicapai oleh Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Rahim Nor dengan timbalannya, Tan Sri Norian Mai dan beliau selaku Pegawai Penyiasat kes itu agar ia ditutup dengan penuh hormat.

"Sebenarnya persetujuan untuk penutupan sepenuhnya insiden mata-lebam itu, dicapai antara jam 2.30 petang hingga 3.30 petang hari Khamis 8.10.1998," katanya.

Persetujuan ini dicapai diantara Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor (TSRN), Ketua Polis Negara ketika itu,Tan Sri Norian Mai,Timbalan Ketua Polis Negara dan saya selaku Pegawai Penyiasat,didalam bilik Pejabat TSRN sendiri

"Setelah memberi persetujuan tersebut saya lihat wajah TSRN begitu tenang,dan menerusi “body language” beliau, saya dapati seolah beliau begitu lega, setelah beban diatas bahunya dilepaskan.

"Malah beliau sambil bersahaja menanyakan kepada Tan Sri Norian, sama ada beliau(TSRN) layak membeli staff-car Mercedes yang sedang beliau gunakan itu, dan jika boleh beliau minta tolong, untuk repair sedikit-sedikit mana yang rosak," tulisnya.

Keputusan yang dicapai, berdasarkan tulisan Mat Zain itu, Tan Sri Rahim akan mengaku memukul Anwar sehingga lebam matanya dan meletakkan jawatan kerana kesalahan itu.

Namun semua itu berubah apabila Peguam Negara ketika itu, Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah diiringi orang kuatnya Datuk Abdul Gani Patail telah menemui Rahim Noor.

"Manusia hanya boleh merancang, tetapi Allah sahaja yang boleh menentukanNya. Saya mendapat tahu kemudiannya, iaitu pada jam lebih kurang 5.00 hingga 5.30 petang 8.10.1998 itu,Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah (Allahyarham) diringi oleh orang kuatnya Datuk Abdul Ghani Patail ,telah menemui TSRN dibilik Pejabat KPN," tulis Mat Zain.

"Lebih kurang jam 6.00 petang itu saya dipanggil untuk berjumpa dengan Tan Sri Norian dan beliau cuma memberitahu saya “untuk meneruskan siasatan seperti biasa”,dan apabila melihat beliau membuat gesture bahunya sedemikian,saya faham bahawa persetujuan yang dicapai antara kami beberapa jam sahaja sebelum itu telah dibatalkan.

"Saya harus menyatakan bahawa saya terkejut dan hampa dengan perubahan ini, tetapi siapalah saya untuk menghalangnya, oleh kerana kita sendiri tidak tahu apa yang akan berlaku pada hari esok," tulisnya lagi.

Suruhanjaya Diraja yang ditubuhkan kerajaan untuk menyiasat tragedi Mata Lebam itu mendapati Rahim yang bersalah kerana memukul Anwar.

Namun sebelum itu, siasatan polis tidak pernah mendedahkan Rahim yang bersalah bahkan Tun Dr Mahathir pernah mendakwa Anwar mencederakan dirinya sendiri.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Sarawakians, open your eyes

For our Sarawakian friends, you should read this to see how corrupted our Government has become: http://www.sarawakreport.org

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!